If you're a lover of the special sexual activity known as gangbang you might want to check this out...

Sabrina Deep is celebrating her birthday in a way she'll remember for a while - on September 8th 2007 she's attempting to set a new record with the largest and longest gangbang ever to be broadcast live on the internet. The gangbang will feature at least 80 guys fucking her during a time span of 8 hours.  "The men will not be given any time-limits to fuck me" Sabrina states, "if they can last for 8 hours, they can fuck me for 8 hours, they can have repeated orgasms and they can fuck any of my holes."



She actually invited all of her members to take part in the event, which is held in London UK.  "It's a present i wanted to give to myself and to my fans to celebrate my birthday and one year of activity and all i expect it is to orgasm and to squirt for the whole event. In 3 words: i hate lube." Sabrina describes her reason for wanting to do this.

The whole event from start to finish is going to be available as webcam show for free as long as you are a member of her site. Alternatively you can grab the DVD that she has announced is to be released later this year with the whole 8-hour event uncut.



What's left other than wishing Sabrina Deep a happy birthday!

If you want to read more about Sabrina Deep or see the latest info about the gangbang check out her blog.

Read the review of Sabrina Deep on Adult Reviews .net here

Watch a gallery with Sabrina Deep here

Take the tour of Sabrina Deep here

If you are travelling the web to find and download pictures you for sure will be successful. But the differences between how well the site works differ very much. There are sites around that will be a charm for you and you will love them for sure - and others are a pain in the ass!

After having discovered a site you find interesting, you should try to recognize what sort of comfort it has. Does it have ZIP-files? To answer this you of course can check the preview. But my own recipe for this is to check out review sites like Adult Reviews - a review has to answer whether a site has ZIP-files, how well it is suited for downloading or whether it is hampering downloads as much as possible. If ZIP-files are not mentioned in reviews, there will most likely be none.

My recommendation is plain and simple: Prefer sites with ZIP-files! If you want that comfort to become the standard, contribute to make sites using them successful and sites not using them a loser!

If you have subscribed to a site, treat it fair. If you like it - others will too, so don't spoil it for everyone! Do not share the login with others (you will lose it), do not redistribute pictures and try to use safe and long enough passwords that are different for every site you subscribe to, to protect yourself against password thefts.

If you have decided to use a spider you should be aware that this can be a both practical and dangerous tool that is not to be abused. You can minimize your risk if you handle it with care as described above. But if there are ZIP-files on a site, NEVER try to use a spider! And if the spider won't work - what should you do? Well download content from the site manually but consider not keeping your subscription alive for a longer period and not returning to this site before they move forward and provide the beloved ZIP-files!

And if a site uses DRM - boycott it! This will be the best and perhaps only measurement to prevent many sites from using DRM in the future.

Use your common sense - and have fun!

- Uli

But what about those sites not offering ZIP-files and also not using these hampering strategies as described? Well, there are some nice little nifty tools around named "spiders" that might be able to do the job all alone, mostly just needing a starting adress and the password - then it takes some time but the result is the site's content on your harddrive whithout you lifting a finger. There are different kinds of such programs around, e.g. MisterPix, an older picture downloading tool which only tries to download specified content (pictures, movies, text-files etc.) but fails when sites are using Java or even PHP. Another example of the same strategy is Picaloader which can handle Java and very often manages with PHP or special password-entry pages. Different from these is Pagesucker, which tries to establish an exact working (!) copy of the downloaded site on your harddrive. It's obvious that this normally won't work with dynamically created structures of websites using databases and creating all web-code on demand. In fact you have to try out what works. Just note that a tool like "Get Right" is not a spider of this type - the difference is it can't analyze the target site and find out by itself what content is there.

Before crying happily about what I just told you and thinking this might be a solution to all of your problems you again should try to understand the webmasters' point of view: Spiders can cause a high load on websites increasing the load on the server for other users. Furthermore if you "do" a site with a spider you might be able to shorten your subscription, which the webmaster also won't like. On the other hand just looking at myself, successful use of spiders has had the effect that I subscribed to more sites than I would have done without a spider and thus spent more money there.

Nevertheless you should be aware of the webmasters' attitude towards spiders, which is something between strictly banning and overlooking it if the usage ain't too hard. There are some sites around where you can read "spiders strictly forbidden". That is not subject of discussion - take it as a fact. I consider this fair and acceptable as long as members are made aware of it on the site. Do not expect it to be just words - tools like the already mentioned Pennywize can clearly recognize the very typical traces of a spider and block them out very fast. If you are unlucky, you might even loose your subscription - I experienced that too. Even if there is nothing written about spiders, it's never clear whether the usage of such a tool is possible. It's a matter of webdesign, which is not something you can check from outside the members area and sites like the already mentioned "Realswingers" or "Rachel Aziani" are done in a way so that no spider can handle them - it simply does not find anything.

But even if the spider works and seems to be successful it is a risky situation: You very often do not know where the security download limit in Megabytes for a site is - but you should be aware that most sites have this! A little hint for this might be the presence of movies - if there are big movies around (most times it doesn't make any sense to download such movies with a spider - manually would be more appropriate) a download limit at least should enable you to download a few of them at one time. NEVER try to download a whole site at once! Check how much data the spider has downloaded and stop it if a given quota e.g. 200MB is reached. Next day you restart it again downloading the same amount thus flying below the webmaster's radar for the detection of hostile activities. The last hint for the usage of a spider: You can reduce the server load caused by the spider if you reduce the number of parallel connections the spider uses. According to my experience do never use more than 3-5 connections - if you are using more you won't be much faster anyway but a hostile reaction of a webmaster is much more likely.

You might have noticed some websites (especially movie sites) nowadays are promoted with "free downloads", "all movies downloadable", "no download-limit" and the like. Yes, there are still sites around offering this, but this also might be a trap: Especially many movie sites nowadays try to protect their content with DRM measures. DRM (Digital Rights Management) means you only can play all the movies as long as the source-site will allow it. You cannot give them to anybody else since you need a login (or the license itself). Ok, I consider the latter to be ok, but I am not willing to accept that any download is only workable as long as your installation of Microsoft's marvellous and reliable working operation system is alive - if you have to re-install it, all your DRM licences will be lost. A transfer or backup of these is not intented and not possible. My own personal way to handle DRM sites can be described with one word: boycott! And if I do a review of a site using DRM I promise the site-owner will not be pleased by this review! And from what I've seen by reviews of others I'm not alone with this attitude.

 Coming up: The conclusion

By visiting (and partially reviewing adult-sites) during the last year I found there are now two different strategies used by websites. The first is to make any downloads as slow as possible and urge you to keep your subscription alive as long as possible. You have to open each picture one after the other (can't even use tabbed browsing and of course not right mouse-click to save directly from the overview) and have to save it individually to your harddrive. A typical representative for this is the Realswingers site - just read my review and you will know what I think of this strategy. But even this can be topped: I was recently subscribed to the Rachel Aziani site-system and found, that all downloading is also hampered this way - even more: Any pic you want to save has the same name so you have to rename each pic you download! I honestly have to say I consider this webmaster behaviour very shortsighted. Most of you will surf adult sites for fun like me, but such sites easily turn into hard work very fast. This is not fun anymore - how can they think we would keep our subscriptions alive for a longer time or even return at a later time? I promise Rachel Aziani will have to wait a long time for me to resubscribe!

The other strategy is the exact opposite of the one described before: Just making the site as comfortable as possible to make the users like it, keep it and come back. This means at first you can download any content with ease - there are not the slightest blocking or hampering measurements. This also means there are ZIP-files available. I have to say ZIP-files are my personally favorites when I visit a site - I normally try to find out before I subscribe to a site whether it uses ZIP files having a look at the preview of the site and of course trying to find an actual review of this site. ZIP files are very comfortable to handle, right-click, download and unpack, that's all. Unpacking nowadays either can be done by using the built-in utility in Windows XP or by several Un-ZIPping programs - some of them of course freely available. Under XP you treat a ZIP-file like a directory and thus can copy any files with ease. I personally have bought PKzip which has some advantages with broken ZIP-files (can repair them) and can be used as a command line tool for faster unzipping. But back to the sites: You can download ZIP-files like pictures, even often parallel or stacked - that's what I call great service!

Just as representatives and examples of this strategy I name the Kelly Madison site and the Teenrotica site, which I reviewed a short while ago. They are all great to visit and paradise for downloaders - I bet you will not be astonished when I'm telling you I was a member of Kelly Madison for four times and I expect that won't be all! As a bottom-line you should clearly understand this: If you want sites to be comfortable to download you have to act politically: Avoid the blocking and uncomfortable sites - prefer those offering a great service!

Stay tuned for part 3 where I will focus on how you make downloading a little easier.

Do you download? Sure you do! There are so many nice ladies on all those great websites - who shouldn't want to make his harddisk happy with them! Do you try to get as many of those gals as possible and you're downloading as fast as your hardware is capable of? Ouch, do you know you are a leecher and some webmasters perhaps might hate you for that? You don't? You do not believe this since you paid for membership? I do and we'll discuss this!

To make two confessions right at the beginning - I do download and I do try my best to get as much as possible - just like you. Since I did this for more than ten years now and thus was subscribed to more than 1200 adult sites I think I know what I'm talking about.

To get the whole situation you should understand first that there's no such thing as free stuff - even those sites which do not have the intention to make money (which I consider to be a small minority) have to earn some money to pay the bills for server and bandwidth use. You believe smut should not be paid for? Well, understand that you either have to concentrate on promotional offers like the TGPs or you have to steal!

Knowing this it's much easier to understand the position of the webmasters. They will love you sincerely if you keep a subscription alive and won't use the site that much - you are paying but not causing costs! Most websites do not pay strictly by the bandwidth that's been used by members but a base price including a given quota of bandwidth in giga- or even terabytes. So it's clear: as soon as too many users are downloading too much the limit might get exceeded which increases the cost of the site - webmasters will do their best to prevent this - at least if the number of subscriptions is not big enough.

But that's not all: Most webmasters fear copyright violations by downloaded and re-published stuff such as in newsgroups and file sharing services. Ever noticed the warnings on some sites? They furthermore fear that the content might get shared with other users thus reducing the number of possible subscriptions. And thirdly they want to keep the load of the servers low to make their usage as comfortable as possible without causing them costs.

What webmasters however fear (and fight!) most is the sharing or hacking of passwords. It's obvious any download quota will quickly be exceeded if a site is massively used by lots of unauthorized users, so this leads to a substantial damage very fast and is thus (correctly) regarded as theft. I have experienced a few times during the last years that websites were closed down because of this and twice I lost legitimately bought passwords by hacking attacks - luckily not by attacks on my system but directly on the site-server. So I started to protect myself by using randomly generated usernames and passwords unique for each subscription I have. Since the pressure by hackers and smut-for-free-guys is still very high, webmasters also have to protect their sites. They use systems like Pennywize, which first blocks a username at once if it is used twice at the same time from different ip-adresses and secondly automatically watches the download behaviour and download quota of each subscriber. If you download stuff manually, normally nothing should happen, but if you get too active these systems automatically block your account depending on a given amount of Megabytes you are allowed to download per day. They might also automatically change your password. Sometimes such systems are badly or viciously configured. I once made such an experience with the site of Alexus Winston, which had a download limit of only 50 MB/day. I then had a 1MBit DSL-connection meaning I could reach that limit within only eight minutes! Since there was nobody on the site to direct my complaints to (or perhaps was thinking the measurement was alright) this subscription was money for nothing - a site that will never receive any payment from me again!

On the other hand the total blockage of downloads is rated as very bad style and very user-unfriendly. I personally (and all other reviewers of Adult Reviews too) would rate a site low if it was to block downloads completely. Luckily this happens rarely, my last experience was with the Belladonna-site  around two years ago. Its content was weak but its protective measures were top! This site was a shame for a top Pornstar like Belladonna - perhaps that's the reason why a complete rework is announced now! I considered it really a poor joke when they wrote that they did this due to picture-redistribution - and I was looking around and found (obviously bought photo-series because of the better quality (!!) ) on lots of other adult servers!

Stay tuned for next part where I will mention tips that can make surfing adult sites easier.

- Uli

I see lots of sob stories from web-site members which I think may well be avoided with being careful before signing up. First off, I always without fail make every attempt I can to go through the cancelation process. If it proving difficult, or in some cases impossible – do not join. It is no use trying to cancel 1 month down the road and finding out you don`t know how to. This does happen.

Check out the intro pages carefully. I have looked at a couple of sites of late where there is one simple page showing 5/6 lovely girls, then they proceed to say “more like these inside” but fail to show you any. They declare there are “tons of videos for members” yet do not give any acurate details. Avoid these sites like the plague -UNLESS- some trustworthy site such as Adult Reviews has already reviewed web-site and given it the thumbs up.

Only pay for one months membership - never any more - if you hate the content you can stand the loss of $30 or so but not 3 or 6 months worth of membership. Also if you truly like the site then make a note of it, a small black book is very useful!! then re-join 9/12 months later and pick up all the new content and you will have a years worth of material for 2 months membership–someone will have paid maybe 12 months fees to get exactly what you have just got. Always write down site details in this little black book!! CC used, date joined, biller used, ie CCBill, etc. leave nothing to memory, you don`t know how important this info could be down the line.

Well these are just a few of my safety tips before you join a site. I will later on relate to you what my reasons are for liking a particular web-site and why I detest some with a vengeance.

Cheers –Don-UK

If you aren't very experienced when it comes to signing up to adult pay sites, be sure to read our adult buyer's guide before you sign up to a pay site.

There is a number of things that are worth checking out on a site before you type in your credit card details. For example it is a good idea to check out the list of recent updates if the site provides it. That way you can be sure that there is a regular supply of fresh content.

You also might want to briefly go through the terms which are presented to you before you accept to sign up. This might not be what you would prefer to do when you are in the mood, but later you might be grateful you did. For example it is a good idea to spend just a couple of minutes on finding out at what time you must give notice when you eventually cancel your membership.

Be sure to consider the payment options to make sure that you don't end up paying for something you don't want. Consider recurring vs. one-time subscriptions and how long a period of time you want to stay a member the first time. We suggest that you try a new site out for a month preferably via a one-time subscription. We also suggest that you don't sign up to trial memberships since they often recur at a higher cost than normal memberships.

You can read more advice more in the adult buyer's guide.

Hello readers!

Welcome to the first blog post on AdultReviews.net. This is the place where yours truly (Jeppe, the editor) will post updates and other information that you will probably find interesting. First of all I would like to direct your attention to our discussion board where you have the chance to give us your input on AdultReviews.net or share your own opinion about a particular site, review, model or anything else that you think relates to pay site browsing. I personally check the forum each day and will respond to any questions you may ask us.

Secondly, we have recently made some improvements to AdultReviews.net:

• Browsing by category
  A review is now by default only listed in its main category. E.g. All Over 30 is only listed in the Mature/MILF category.
  You can however choose to display all reviews that are related to Mature/MILF - i.e. that have Mature/MILF as a subcategory. That way the category overview will look like this.


• Search results can now be sorted
  When you search for a site name, site URL, category or anything else, you can now sort the results as when displaying the categories.


• DRM sites clearly marked
  All sites using DRM will be clearly marked with a logo next to the site name in both the overview listings and the review page itself. See here for an example.

We hope that these improvements have made it easier for you to find the information you are looking for.

That's about it for this time - happy surfing!