Your guide to better porn!

HomeCategoriesSologirlsSarah and Melli review

Sarah and Melli Review

Summary: Sarah and Melli are two amateur girls, one slender and the other curvaceous with big natural tits and together they've built a nice little nude photography site. The content is softcore and never all that vulgar (lots of focus on the girls' tits and figures in bikinis, etc). The site only offers photographs though and they are just all right in quality. There were no features to interact with the girls and not even a fact sheet about them. The site needs to add some of these features before it can be a great site, in my opinion.

Score 70.0 /100
Overall:
Quality:
Speed:
Content:
Price:
Navigation:
About Our Ratings
Author:
Jerry Fritz, 2012-10-22

Categories:
Sologirls, 18-23, Amateur, Personal-amateur, Boobs, Fetish, Photography / studio, Softcore

Tags:
artistic nudes, authentic amateurs, big boobs, girl next door, natural breasts, nude photography, outdoor, solo posing

Intro promises

"It's the first time we show our bodies on the internet!" - Sarah and Melli

- 3,850 High Res pictures
- 28,500 bous pictures

First impression

Sarah and Melli are two attractive amateur girls who have put together a simple website. According to them, this is the first time they've taken nude and semi nude photos of themselves and put them online, so this is an exclusive personal amateur collection.

I like the idea: instead of a site starring just one girl, you get two girls who are great friends and going into their adventure in nude photography and porn together. The site only talks about picture quality on the tour though (high resolution) and there's no mention of video.

I had several questions about what Sarah and Melli could offer, so I signed up. Read on for an in depth look at what they can offer.

Pricing

Payment Processors:
CCBill

Our opinion

Sarah and Melli are pure amateurs, and they look to be the ones that run the site as well as star in it. The focus is on photography alone, with no video content added to date. The library isn't huge but it's exclusive, and the models, one naturally busty the other more slender, provide a nice contrast one to the other for your nude viewing. There was a lot to be worked on and improved here, but there are some signs of future promise if the girls are ready to commit and keep working hard on their porn site.

Two Pretty Amateur Girls Give Nude Modeling A Go

Sarah and Melli are both blondes, but they've got quite different figures. Sarah is slender and a bit athletic with small breasts, and Melli has big natural breasts and is a little bit more curvaceous. Melli seems more comfortable totally nude, as her many bathing pics and topless shots show off.

I didn't see any photographs in any of the sets that were closeups or very lewd. That means no closeups between the legs and those sort of shots. In fact, I don't think in any of the shots the girls have their bottom halves totally exposed. Melli is totally nude in several shots but always with her legs crossed or her hand hanging between her legs. If you're looking for the more 'vulgar' shots (for lack of a better word), Sarah and Melli won't be your cup of tea. It's more about teasing and being topless.

There was some very mild fetish play, mostly of the wet and messy variety as Melli covered herself in syrups, foods, soap bubbles and other things in some very fun and sexy sets.

Only Photographs

Sarah and Melli are only shooting photographs, not videos. This wouldn't be an issue if only the galleries were of a higher quality. The largest resolution images open to is 839x1261 pixels. The lighting and color is also just a little flat. I get the feeling they are working with Pro-Am photographers, not industry leading talent behind the camera. On the other hand, it gives their sets that authentic amateur touch. I think some surfers will like it and others will wish for higher quality.

Not a Huge Collection

The site isn't huge. There are just 37 galleries online. They add a new gallery every 7 days. Most sets had around 20-40 pictures in them (some are closer to 100), so we're not looking at a huge amount of content.

No Interaction with the Girls

I think having no information about or access to the models is a really big issue that Sarah and Melli need to fix ASAP. There is no biography, no interviews, no behind the scenes content, and besides a basic contact form no way to interact with or talk to the models. Occasional cam shows, a forum, or some other type of interaction needs to be added for this site.

A Mixed Collection of Bonus Galleries

They have a huge library of bonus picture galleries (1,065 sets) and these feature everything from hardcore, wet and messy sex to lesbians and solo girls posing and masturbating. The bonus galleries are considerably more explicit than Sarah and Melli's sets.

Conclusion

Sarah and Melli are two sexy amateurs, but their site feels a little light and lacks interaction with the models.

I think Sarah and Melli are on to a great idea here, teaming up to make a personal amateur porn site. The softcore galleries show some nice nude shots and even get adventurous with wet and messy food play. But the site is missing interaction and information. The girls need to put up biographies, likes and dislikes, and add some place on the site for members to talk and chat with them, be it a cam show or a forum.

Competitors

If you like the way the girls themselves make the content and take care of the site, then you've got a lot more to explore in the Personal Amateur niche that will interest you.

If you liked Melli's big knockers then check out Danielle FTV. She also runs her own site, but here the quality is quite a bit higher. She's a tall blonde with big natural tits and in the last year she's been adding explicit masturbation and hardcore sex movies to the collection of glamour galleries and videos she has online.

Housewife Kelly runs her own site as well. She has a huge library of videos starring her and her husband having sex. Handjobs, blow jobs, solo masturbation, you can find it all here.

Screenshots

Screenshot 1 from members areaScreenshot 2 from members areaScreenshot 3 from members areaScreenshot 4 from members areaScreenshot 5 from members area

Samples

Image sample 1 from members areaImage sample 2 from members areaImage sample 3 from members areaImage sample 4 from members areaImage sample 5 from members area

External Opinions

Don't take our word for it and see what others think! We have collected a list of opinions and impressions from other sites, so you can compare them all from one place.

2014-02-06
69.5/100
Total average: 68.4/100 Our score: 70.0/100

User Comments

Write your comment - feedback is appreciated



 


Comments from other readers

UserComment
No comments yet - please help make our site better for everyone by adding your comment.