Reviews tagged with c cup
Layout: Detailed | Simple
- Overall Score Sitename Review date
-
offline
from Imlive.comReview date: 2010-03-01
Review summary: FreeLove22 was loads of fun--hot loads, actually. She emanated sexuality and rampant lust, from her perfect body to her seductive manner of speaking. 1.98 credits per minute is an excellent price for her show. In fact, I think it is a bit too low for such a wonderful performer.
-
offline
from Imlive.comReview date: 2010-02-27
Review summary: KittyInYourLap was definitely worth the 3.80 credits/minute price tag. She chatted in an engaging manner, genuinely interested in communicating. Her demeanor was polite and friendly. Best of all, she knew how to work the camera, making the blood pump to not just the obvious places. I strongly recommend seeing her.
-
offline
from Privatefeeds.comReview date: 2010-02-21
Review summary: Fifi put on one hot show, and I can imagine that it would have only grown hotter if I had stayed longer. She is one of the website’s top models because her shows are exceedingly sexy, and she isn’t shy about talking dirty. The $5.99/min price is not for everyone, though.
-
offline
from Cams.comReview date: 2010-03-29
Review summary: I wondered at one point why SeeMeSquirt was a cam girl. She didn’t seem to be having fun, especially with that big dildo. It looked like it hurt her! Still, she is a trooper and seemed to care about pleasing her viewers. $3.99/min is a fair price for her performance.
-
offline
from Cams.comReview date: 2010-03-20
Review summary: Electrik's performance was truly electrifying. The only thing that could have improved the show was sound, but I did not get such privileges as a voyeur. The action itself in addition to her facial expressions more than made up for this.
-
offline
from SeventeenLive.comReview date: 2010-06-29
Review summary: Anabel put on a rather hot show. I really enjoyed the stripping. Though she had sound, all I heard was her typing and models talking in the background. This definitely lowers the arousal factor. She doesn't have to moan when her clothes come off, but hearing other models talking in an undecipherable is not very sexy.
-
offline
from Cams.comReview date: 2010-03-30
Review summary: SexyAss was right to the point. The sexual conduct started mere seconds into the private show. That is really what I like to see. It is nice to talk to the models, but when I have multiple reviews to complete, I can’t spend five minutes each session just idly talking.
-
offline
from Imlive.comReview date: 2010-03-15
Review summary: Viewers who like seeing dildo penetration, both vaginal and anal, will really enjoy CatherineZ24. Before she does any sort of penetration, though, she likes to strip. I don’t think there'll be many complaints there. Stripping gets the heart pounding on both ends. 2.80 credits per minute is a fair price.
-
offline
from Privatefeeds.comReview date: 2010-02-20
Review summary: DeepInside is an arousing model. She was on the top-ten list of performers at the time I caught her private show. The technical quality was quite nice, too. Her price of $4.99/min means that she is more accessible to viewers low on funds that want to catch a quality model.
-
offline
from Imlive.comReview date: 2010-02-19
Review summary: n01nadia will not appeal to everyone. Viewers interested in her chat must like dominant shemales. That is quite a small niche; at least I think it is. If you do manage to fit into this rather limited category, I think that 2.80 credits per minute is not a bad price.
-
offline
from Imlive.comReview date: 2010-08-27
Review summary: Eva is a self-proclaimed "divine gothic goddess". She won't be for everyone, but for those of you with dark tastes, she is a real treat. She might need a little prodding to get her to pay attention, but once she starts, there is no stopping her. She just needs better sound equipment.
-
offline
from SeventeenLive.comReview date: 2010-07-16
Review summary: Hailey put on a great strip show. Her entire body moved sensually as her clothes came off one article at a time. However, she is prone to typing and will suck you into a lengthy conversation if you do not keep your wits about you. She also doesn't utilize her sound, which is also of a low technical quality.
-
offline
from SeventeenLive.comReview date: 2010-07-07
Review summary: Her show took a bit to get started. Once she did begin, it took her several tries to get the angles right every time she switched positions. While the show was decent, her refusal to use sound to do anything other than moan (even though she had no qualms about talking to other models in the room) negatively impacted her score.
-
offline
from Imlive.comReview date: 2010-03-05
Review summary: I wouldn’t bother trying to coax TekilaBOOM69 into doing anything. She refused to for me, even kicking me out of her room at one point! That is extremely unprofessional, and I don’t think she should be a webcam model. She’s not even good to talk to because she types so slowly.
